Columbia University has a long history laying a welcome mat for antisemites.
After the vile “encampments” at the university and threats to Jewish students, the Jewish community held an event on May 31, 2024 to discuss Jew hatred and what to do about it. Three Columbia deans attended the event and mocked the pain expressed. They were suspended and later resigned after their private texts became public.
The New York Times had a particular take on the episode.

The Times headline wrote about “deans who sent insulting texts.” But the texts weren’t simply offhand “insulting”; they were antisemitic.
In the sub-header, the Times was more clear that the messages “disparaged Jewish panelists” but was silent on the fact that this was a panel of Jews specifically discussing antisemitism at the university. A casual reader could have concluded that maybe the deans posted something about a select number of Jews who happened to be discussing something generic. The deans didn’t just mock Jewish panelists but the entire notion that there is any antisemitism.
The article started to make the point more clear but not sufficiently.

But then the article went off the rails.
It said that the episode was “deeply embarrassing to the administration.” How is the university the subject here? Jews are the point of concern, not the administration.
And the administration was not embarrassed. It has systematically allowed Jews to be insulted, intimidated and harassed for years.

The notion that the current wave of antisemitism is just a “powerful wave of pro-Palestinian activism,” is a disgraceful whitewash by the Times of jihadi Jew-hatred manifest in the encampments. To label people who celebrate Hamas’ massive butchering of over one thousand people “a symbol of the Palestinian resistance” is to platform antisemitic propaganda.

The New York Times and Columbia University, both headquartered in New York City – home to the largest Jewish diaspora community in the world – cannot fathom antisemitism even when they are forced to focus on it. It is a feature of numb antisemitism, an ingrained belief that Jews are privileged and powerful.
The liberal elite have victims of preference and they are not the most persecuted minority-minority. The Jews are sacrificial lambs to be offered on the altar of intersectionality according to the demands of the socialist-jihadi mob. A small price for the alt-left to gain the audience of the growing global south, shrouded in smug self-righteousness in a toxic empathy swamp.
It’s called “Globalize the Intifada,” and being mainstreamed daily under your nose.
Related articles:
Ignoring Columbia’s – And The Education Industry’s – Systemic Antisemitism (July 2024)
Globalize The Intifada With Socialists (May 2024)
Peacefully Calling For The Annihilation Of Jews (May 2024)
Columbia Does Not Consider The Mental Health Of Jews (May 2024)
Every Picture And Headline Tells A Story: Columbia’s Pro-Palestinian Students Are NOT Antisemitic (April 2024)
Considering Campus Antisemitism (November 2023)
The Antisemitic Campus: Decolonize Palestine (October 2023)
Columbia University Completely Fails Mission. And Jews (October 2023)
The Center Of Intersectionality Sounds Like Adolf Hitler (July 2023)
New York Times’ Muslim Anti-Semitism Washing (October 2022)
The Noxious Anti-Semitism Of “European Settler Colonialism” (September 2022)
The New York Times Refuses To State Judaism’s Holiest Site (August 2022)
Columbia University’s Latest Anti-Semitic Inanity: “Palestinian Hebrews” (July 2022)
The New York Times Continues ‘Powerful Jew’ Myth (June 2022)
No Jews Killed In New York Times Telling Of Palestinian Terror Wave (May 2022)
The New York Times Is Morphing Into The Notorious Dearborn Independent (March 2022)
The Veil of Hatred (December 2020)
New York Times Recharacterizes Hamas as a Right-Wing Terrorist Group (September 2020)
Is Columbia University Promoting Violence Against Israel and Jews? (December 2019)
